Islamic Azad University, Khodabandeh Branch, Zanjan Arman Process Journal (APJ) 2783-1361 3 1 2022 05 22 Examining the Legitimacy of Cryptocurrencies from a Jurisprudential Perspective as a New Method of Contract Payment in Digital Relations Examining the Legitimacy of Cryptocurrencies from a Jurisprudential Perspective as a New Method of Contract Payment in Digital Relations 8 23 253919 10.22034/apj.2022.253919 FA Mehdi Babaeii گروه حقوق دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد ورامین، تهران، ایران Mohammad Hadi Zahedi گروه فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی ، تهران، ایران Elham Farahani دانشکده مهندسی کامپیوتر، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران Journal Article 2022 05 29 Background and Objectives: The cryptocurrencies, including bitcoins, are the fruits of the development of information technology in the international and even domestic financial system in the last decade. Have brought with them. In the present study, From the point of view of individual jurisprudence, the cryptocurrencies are a kind of property, their transactions are not usury and arrogance, and therefore, if the transaction basis of the cryptocurrencies is correct from the religious point of view, its exchange is permissible, but if the transaction basis of the cryptocurrencies is not legitimate, Their transaction is void and forbidden. <br>Methods: In this study which is descriptive-analytical; we reviewed most of the governmental jurisprudence documents about cryptocurrency trading.<br>Findings: The result of the present study is that based on arguments such as the no-harm rule, the rule of respect and the rule of maintaining order, and the rule of action and the rule of justice, which all prevent the implementation of incorrect monetary policies and increase the problematic amount of money in the Islamic economic system.<br>Conclusion: It is advisable to prevent transactions in the field of currency cryptocurrency until the legal order is established by the government to control the cryptocurrency in the country's economy. Background and Objectives: The cryptocurrencies, including bitcoins, are the fruits of the development of information technology in the international and even domestic financial system in the last decade. Have brought with them. In the present study, From the point of view of individual jurisprudence, the cryptocurrencies are a kind of property, their transactions are not usury and arrogance, and therefore, if the transaction basis of the cryptocurrencies is correct from the religious point of view, its exchange is permissible, but if the transaction basis of the cryptocurrencies is not legitimate, Their transaction is void and forbidden. <br>Methods: In this study which is descriptive-analytical; we reviewed most of the governmental jurisprudence documents about cryptocurrency trading.<br>Findings: The result of the present study is that based on arguments such as the no-harm rule, the rule of respect and the rule of maintaining order, and the rule of action and the rule of justice, which all prevent the implementation of incorrect monetary policies and increase the problematic amount of money in the Islamic economic system.<br>Conclusion: It is advisable to prevent transactions in the field of currency cryptocurrency until the legal order is established by the government to control the cryptocurrency in the country's economy. https://www.armanprocessjournal.ir/article_253919_09da51c98238585005d8cc61b1a52026.pdf